Visit the Zuken web site
Click on the advert above to visit the company web site

Product category: Electronics Manufacturing Quality Assurance
News Release from: Machine Vision Products | Subject: Ericsson Lynchburg
Edited by the Electronicstalk Editorial Team on 18 October 2001

Implementing dynamic process control

Request your FREE weekly copy of the Electronicstalk email newsletter. News about Electronics Manufacturing Quality Assurance and more every issue. Click here for details.

Engineers at an Ericsson basestation plant have used existing information from AOI systems to achieve greater throughput, lower defect rates and complete closed loop process control.

The history of PCB assembly is highlighted by the continued automation that now drives high-speed electronics manufacturing Step by step, each segment of the process, from screen printing to placement to reflow, test and now into final assembly, has been made faster by what can only be described as mind-blowing advances in machines and software

But the landscape is changing as the industry matures.

Today's price-sensitive market realities beg two very important questions.

Can next generation automation continue to substantially lower manufacturing costs and push profitability? If not, what is the next development that will drive EMS and OEM companies? More than esoteric queries suggested by ivory tower theorists, the questions are of critical concern for today's manufacturers, as well as for industry organisations working to develop the roadmaps that will, it is hoped, guarantee the strength and health of the electronics industry.

According to one such organisation, the National Electronics Manufacturing Initiative (NEMI), the key to future profitability has shifted from automation to sound business practices.

As quoted in Electronic News (15th January 2001) NEMI's president, Jim McElroy, believes, "The prime source for continuing cost reduction has migrated from manufacturing efficiency to improved supply chain management...Industry has optimised manufacturing efficiencies, and continued productivity gains in materials conversion will only be incremental...".

McElroy's analysis comes as no surprise to high-end manufacturers or international EMS companies.

By themselves, "incremental" increases in profitability are not enough to overcome downward price pressures.

How then do you push profits and reduce costs beyond NEMI's better business practices? For Ericsson in Lynchburg, Virginia (Plant 52 to be exact - and now part of SCI), much of this solution involves taking advantage of digital technologies and the full capabilities of automated systems.

The key word is "full".

Ericsson engineers wanted to use existing information gathered by AOI systems to achieve greater throughput, lower defect rates and complete closed loop process control of their basestation SMT line.

In part, Ericsson's vision of improved line efficiency runs counter to the industry's traditional focus: that is, a narrow vision focused on individual machines.

The reason for this limited focus is understandable: Automation was put in place one process at a time - the concept of total line efficiency, from pre- to post-reflow, has taken a back seat to the simple desire to optimise the line one machine at a time.

But such tunnel vision can no longer be the order of the day.

Along with best management practices, profitability and quality depend upon quantifiable line optimisation, independent of equipment brands or models, increased throughput and real time SPC across the entire line.

With these procedures as standard industry practice, only then can it be claimed that manufacturing efficiency has reached its apex.

Ericsson (now SCI) Lynchbu